Tiny black holes from the dawn of time may be altering our planet's orbit, new study suggests

This computer-simulated image shows a supermassive black hole at the core of a galaxy.
A computer-simulated image of an ancient black hole. (Image credit: NASA, ESA, and D. Coe, J. Anderson, and R. van der Marel (STScI))

Some of the universe's oldest black holes swoop past our cosmic neighborhood at least once every decade, moving planets in their wake, a new study suggests. And if scientists can detect them, it would provide the first proof that these black holes exist as dark matter.

Black holes, regions of immense gravity that even trap light, are some of the cosmos' most bizarre objects. But arguably the strangest among them are primordial black holes (PBHs). Astronomers have hypothesized that PBHs formed when dense, hot regions of space collapsed in the second immediately following the Big Bang.

Depending on when they were born in this one-second interval, PBHs are projected to have masses ranging from a hundred-thousandth the mass of a paper clip to that of 100,000 suns. But some scientists believe that PBHs with masses between asteroids like Juno and Eros are the most important because they may be primarily made of dark matter, a mysterious material that glues components of galaxies together.

There's a problem, though. No astronomical observations have ever definitively identified black holes of this type and mass (which, despite their asteroid-like mass, are "between the size of a hydrogen molecule and the size of an average bacterium," study authors Tung Tran, Sarah Geller, Benjamin Lehmann, and David Kaiser — all researchers at the Center for Theoretical Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — wrote in a joint email to Live Science).

If such a PBH were to encounter Earth, it wouldn't destroy the planet. Yet the new study, published Dec. 28, 2023 on the preprint database arXiv, suggests PBHs should subtly  affect objects in the solar system. If "a PBH flies by a planet, it starts that planet wobbling or rocking slightly around the path it was taking before the flyby," the authors wrote in the email.

That means the distances of planets from the sun — or from us — will change over time. Measuring these periodic oscillations in distance could reveal a PBH's passage.

Related: James Webb telescope discovers oldest black hole in the universe

To reach this conclusion, the researchers first calculated how closely a PBH would have to whizz past an object in the solar system to alter its movement. They found this distance could be very large — as much as a few astronomical units or AUs. (One AU is the distance from Earth to the sun.)

Using data about the positions of planets and certain moons from the JPL Horizons database (which records the positions of an additional 1 million solar system objects), the researchers performed simulations to calculate how the trajectories of the planets or moons would change, assuming a PBH with the mass of an asteroid came within 2 AUs of the sun. Over a period of years, the orbits of the planets and moons would wobble by around 1 or more inches or even several feet.

However, actually detecting these wobbles and confirming they are the result of PBH flybys will be extremely challenging. It turns out we have pretty precise measurements of how far certain celestial objects are from Earth, thanks to numerous space missions — for instance, Martian rovers have helped calibrate the Earth-Mars distance to within 4 inches (10 centimeters). But this isn't the case with other celestial bodies. The error margins of some measurements are very similar to the distances by which the planets would likely get pushed by a PBH, according to the study.

So even if the paths of such objects changed, astronomers wouldn't be able to say if it was because of an instrument error or an actual PBH. What's needed, the researchers said, are more precise simulations and higher-quality observations.

Deepa Jain
Live Science contributor

Deepa Jain is a freelance science writer from Bengaluru, India. Her educational background consists of a master's degree in biology from the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and an almost-completed bachelor's degree in archaeology from the University of Leicester, UK. She enjoys writing about astronomy, the natural world and archaeology. 

  • Dan the skeptic
    Puh-leez!!!! Atom sized black holes passing by at over 100 million miles away altering a planets orbit? You wanna know what else id bet they would alter?? How's about the stupid ligo/vrgo data that claims to have detected "merging black holes" and "magnetars" and "neutron stars" . It's nonsense! Space fairy tales! Nobody has seen a black hole, we have no proof they exist, we are being fed fantasy to keep your head in outer space!
    Reply
  • seanrlu
    To the article author: did you intend to say they were "made of" dark matter, or "make up" dark matter, as in dark matter is comprised of these PBHs. Because that is my understanding, that PBHs are candidates to "be" dark matter. Not necessarily that they are made of dark matter.

    Anyways. To the other commenter, I don't think that constant velocity black holes create gravitational waves. Maybe that's what you're missing, and why you're confused... Because these PBHs are, by their nature - fast and weakly interacting. But what do I know. Honestly not much, PBHs are still just a hypothesis at this point. But the math and theory behind them is pretty clear on how they would interact if they in fact do exist.... Nothing made up about any of that.
    Reply
  • LaraK
    ah yes, the pesky issue of never having seen it and so just hypothesizing anything that fits within the boundaries of what we don't know which is quite a large space.
    Reply
  • ManInBlack4Ever🖕
    Your a Nut Bar
    Reply
  • sven
    Dan the skeptic said:
    Puh-leez!!!! Atom sized black holes passing by at over 100 million miles away altering a planets orbit? You wanna know what else id bet they would alter?? How's about the stupid ligo/vrgo data that claims to have detected "merging black holes" and "magnetars" and "neutron stars" . It's nonsense! Space fairy tales! Nobody has seen a black hole, we have no proof they exist, we are being fed fantasy to keep your head in outer space!
    Then what invisible object with a mass of 4.1 million suns at the center of our galaxy are stars orbiting if black holes don't exist?
    Reply
  • Bruzote
    This article does not make sense.

    When I studied physics, mass had two measures - inertial and gravitational. They were believed to correspond to the same underlying quality, but nothing could prove it. I believe all of that is still true. Now, the article states the PBHs have the mass of asteroids. The article also states these PHBs are expected to alter orbits of planets to a degree that can be detected by experiment - and attributed to such PBHs.

    Really? If something the mass of an asteroid can make a measurable impact on an orbit, **then what about the similar orbital effects of all the actual asteroids and comets that have similar mass?** At least the ones coming within two AU? And what about the bigger ones further out where the mass counteracts the distance effect? The article makes no mention as to how that is dealt with. That is a gross oversight.
    Reply